clinical and laboratory parameters

Clinical Significance of Immunophenotyping of Bone Marrow Cells in Multiple Myeloma

LYMPHOID TUMORS , , , , ,

OYu Yakimovich, OM Votyakova, NV Lyubimova, NN Tupitsyn

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, 24 Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478

For correspondence: Oksana Yur’evna Yakimovich, graduate student, 24 Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, Russian Federation, 115478; Tel.: +7(499)324-28-54; e-mail: ronc_ramn@mail.ru

For citation: Yakimovich OYu, Votyakova OM, Lyubimova NV, Tupitsyn NN. Clinical Significance of Immunophenotyping of Bone Marrow Cells in Multiple Myeloma. Clinical oncohematology. 2016;9(3):296-301 (In Russ).

DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2016-9-3-296-301

ABSTRACT

Aim. To analyze the relationship between expression of aberrant CD45, CD19, CD56 markers on the plasma cells and clinical and laboratory findings and prognostically significant parameters in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods. This scientific research includes data on clinical investigation and immunophenotyping of bone marrow cells obtained from 64 MM patients treated in the N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center over the period from 2004 to 2015. The three-color flow cytometry was performed using a direct immunofluorescence technique (CD38-PerCP, CD138-FITC monoclonal antibodies) and PE-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD45, CD19, and CD56.

Results. Comparison of average values of the total count of plasma cells, the number of plasmablasts, proplasmacyte and mature plasma cells (according to the myelogram) and comparison of these data with the level of expression of the CD19 marker demonstrated a significant relationship between the CD19 negative immunophenotype and both a higher level of the total count of plasma cells and immature plasma cells. There also was a significant correlation between the CD19 negative immunophenotype and a higher level of C-reactive protein, which is significant prognostic factor in MM. In addition, there was a significant relationship between the CD19 negative phenotype and a higher percentage of young neutrophils in blood, i.e. with a more frequent “left shift”. The CD56 negative phenotype is associated with plasmablastic morphology of plasma cells and with the presence of plasma cells in the peripheral blood. Plasma cell leukemia is more common in patients with СD56 negative phenotype of myeloma cells. The CD45 negative immunophenotype was associated with a higher level of k-type FLCs, Bence-Jones proteinuria and with a higher serum creatinine, than in the cases of CD45 positive phenotype.

Conclusion. The study of the immunophenotype of plasma cells in MM has important scientific and practical significance and requires further study.

Keywords: multiple myeloma, aberrant immunophenotype of malignant plasma cells, CD45, CD19, and CD56 markers, clinical and laboratory parameters.

Received: March 17, 2016

Accepted: April 1, 2016

Read in PDF (RUS) pdficon

REFERENCES

  1. Зуева Е.Е., Русанова Е.Б., Куртова А.В. Диагностика множественной миеломы и мониторинг эффективности терапии. Иммунология гемопоэза. 2008;5(2):44–56.
    [Zueva EE, Rusanova EB, Kurtova AV. Diagnosis of multiple myeloma and treatment efficacy monitoring. Immunologiya gemopoeza. 2008;5(2):44–56. (In Russ)]
  2. Bataille R, Jero G, Robillard N, et al. The phenotype of normal, reactive and malignant plasma cells. Identification of “many and multiple myelomas” and of new targets for myeloma therapy. Haematologica. 2006;91(9):1234–40.
  3. de Tute RM, Jack AS, Child JA, et al. A single-tube six-colour flow cytometry screening assay for the detection of minimal residual disease in myeloma. Leukemia. 2007;21(9):2046–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404815.
  4. Johnsen HE, Bogsted М, Klausen TW, et al. Multiparametric flow cytometry profiling of neoplastic plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2010;78В(5):338–47. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20523.
  5. Manzanera GM, San Miguel Izquierdo JF, de Matos OA. Immunophenotyping of plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Meth Mol Med. 2005;113:5–24. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-916-8:5.
  6. Mateo G, Castellanos M, Rasillo A, et al. Genetic abnormalities and patterns of antigenic expression in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(10):3661–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1489.
  7. Ocqueteau M, Orfao A, Almeida J, et al. Immunophenotypic characterization of plasma cells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. Implications for the differential diagnosis between MGUS and multiple myeloma. Am J Pathol. 1998;152(6):1655–65.
  8. Perez-Persona E, Vidriales MB, Mateo G, et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smouldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood. 2007;110(7):2586–92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443.
  9. Rawstron AC, Davies FE, Das Gupta R, et al. Flow cytometric disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: The relationship between normal and neoplastic plasma cells predicts outcome after transplantation. Blood. 2002;100(9):3095–100. doi: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0297.
  10. Rawstron AC, Orfao A, Beksac M, et al. Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica. 2008;93(3):431–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11080.
  11. Robillard N, Pellat-Deceunynck C, Bataille R. Phenotypic characterization of the human myeloma cell growth fraction. Blood. 2005;105(12):4845–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4700.
  12. San Miguel JF, Almeida J, Mateo G, et al. Immunophenotypic evaluation of the plasma cell compartment in multiple myeloma: A tool for comparing the efficacy of different treatment strategies and predicting outcome. Blood. 2002;99(5):1853–6. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.5.1853.
  13. Sezer O, Heider U, Zavrski I, Possinger K. Differentiation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma using flow cytometric characteristics of plasma cells. Haematologica. 2001;86(8):837–43.
  14. Moreau P, Robillard N, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Patients with CD45 negative multiple myeloma receiving high-dose therapy have a shorter survival than those with CD45 positive multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2004;89(5):547–51.
  15. Pellat-Deceunynck C, Barille S, Jego G, et al. The absence of CD56 (NCAM) on malignant plasma cells is a hallmark of plasma cell leukemia and of a special subset of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 1998;12(12):1977–82. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401211.
  16. Jego G, Avet-Loiseau H, Robillard N, et al. Reactive plasmacytoses in multiple myeloma during hematopoietic recovery with G- or GM-CSF. Leuk Res. 2000;24(7):627–30. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(00)00033-3.
  17. Sarasquete ME, Garcia-Sanz R, Gonzalez D, et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. Haematologica. 2005;90(10):1365–72.
  18. Ishikawa H, Tsuyama N, Abroun S, et al. Requirements of src family kinase activity associated with CD45 for myeloma cell proliferation by interleukin-6. Blood. 2002;99(6):2172–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.6.2172.
  19. Robillard N, Wuilleme S, Lode L, et al. CD33 is expressed on plasma cells of a significant number of myeloma patients, and may represent a therapeutic target. Leukemia. 2005;19(11):2021–2. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403948.
  20. Tassone P, Goldmacher VS, Neri P, et al. Cytotoxic activity of the maytansinoid immunoconjugate B-B4- DM1 against CD138+ multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2004;104(12):3688–96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0963.
  21. Treon SP, Raje N, Anderson KC. Immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of plasma cell malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2000;27(5):598–613.
  22. Тупицын Н.Н. Иммунология клеток крови. В кн.: Гематология. Национальное руководство. Под ред. О.А. Рукавицына. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2015. С. 70–8.
    [Tupitsyn NN. Blood cell immunology. In: Rukavitsyn OA, ed. Gematologiya. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. (Hematology. National guidelines.) Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ.; 2015. pp. 70–8. (In Russ)]
  23. Менделеева Л.П., Вотякова О.М., Покровская О.С. и др. Национальные клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению множественной миеломы. Гематология и трансфузиология. 2014;59(приложение 3):1–37.
    [Mendeleeva LP, Votyakova OM, Pokrovskaya OS, et al. National clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma. Gematologiya i transfuziologiya. 2014;59(Suppl. 3):1–37. (In Russ)]
  24. Lin Р. Плазмоклеточная миелома. Прогресс в лечении множественной миеломы. Best Clin Pract, русское издание. 2009;2:11–6.
    [Lin P. Plasma cell myeloma. Progress in treatment of multiple myeloma. Best Clin Pract, Russian edition. 2009;2:11–6 (In Russ)]
  25. Вотякова О.М., Любимова Н.В., Турко Т.А. и др. Клиническое значение исследования свободных легких цепей иммуноглобулинов при множественной миеломе. Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 2010;5(4):16–20.
    [Votyakova OM, Lyubimova NV, Turko TA, et al. Clinical implication of immunoglobulin free light chains study in patients with multiple myeloma. Vestnik RONTs im. N.N. Blokhina RAMN. 2010;5(4):16–20. (In Russ)]