infection

Role of Biochemical Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia

ANTINEOPLASTIC THERAPY COMPLICATIONS , , , , , ,

YuN Dubinina1, VO Sarzhevskii2, VYa Melnichenko2

1 Oncology and Hematology Outpatient Clinic, 2 bld. 1 Molodogvardeiskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 121467

2 NI Pirogov Russian National Medical Center of Surgery, 70 Nizhnyaya Pervomaiskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105203

For correspondence: Yuliya Nikolaevna Dubinina, 2 bld. 1 Molodogvardeiskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 121467; Tel.: +7(499)112-25-04; e-mail: medicinemsc@gmail.com

For citation: Dubinina YuN, Sarzhevskii VO, Melnichenko VYa. Role of Biochemical Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia. Clinical oncohematology. 2019;12(4):461–7 (In Russ).

DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2019-12-4-461-467

ABSTRACT

The growing number of autologous and allogeneic transplantations of bone marrow and hematopoietic stem cells as well as their technological effectiveness give rise to drug antineoplastic therapies with increased toxicity leading to development of complications. The most serious among this sort of complications are infections. Probability of infections in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia reaches 90 %. In this context the search for an optimal marker of infectious complications becomes more and more important. The present review deals with basic biochemical inflammatory markers and the analysis of trials assessing diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and presepsin.

Keywords: sepsis, autologous bone marrow transplantation, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, chemotherapy, infection, procalcitonin, presepsin, C-reactive protein.

Received: May 7, 2019

Accepted: September 11, 2019

Read in PDF

REFERENCES

  1. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Bade P, et al. Is the use of unrelated donor transplantation leveling off in Europe? The 2016 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant activity survey report. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53(9):1139–48. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0153-1.

  2. Ochs L, Shu XO, Miller J, et al. Late infections after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: comparison of incidence in related and unrelated donor transplant recipients. Blood. 1995;86(10):3979–86.

  3. Sorely JS, Shea TC. Prevention of infections in bone marrow transplant recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997;11(2):459–77. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70365-2.

  4. Massaro KSR, Costa SF, Leone C, Chamone DAF. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) as severe systemic infection markers in febrile neutropenic adults. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-137.

  5. Саржевский В.О., Дубинина Ю.Н., Мельниченко В.Я. Диагностическое и прогностическое значение биохимических маркеров инфекционных осложнений высокодозной химиотерапии с аутологичной трансплантацией гемопоэтических стволовых клеток при злокачественных лимфопролиферативных заболеваниях. Клиническая онкогематология. 2017;10(1):113–9. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2017-10-1-113-119.

    [Sarzhevskii VO, Dubinina YuN, Mel’nichenko VYa. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Biochemical Markers of Infectious Complications of High-Dose Therapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphoproliferative Diseases. Clinical oncohematology. 2017;10(1):113–9. doi: 10.21320/2500-2139-2017-10-1-113-119. (In Russ)]

  6. Zhang W, Zhao Q, Huang H. Febrile neutropenic infection occurred in cancer patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2015;47(2):523–7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.013.

  7. Schmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, et al. Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin’s disease: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9323):2065–71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08938-9.

  8. Krishnamani K, Gandhi LV, Sadashivudu G, et al. Epedimiologic, clinical profile and factors affecting the outcome in febrile neutropenia. South Asian J Cancer. 2017;6(1):25–7. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.202565.

  9. Bates DW, Sands K, Miller E, et al. Predicting bacteremia in patients with sepsis syndrome. Academic Medical Center Consortium Sepsis Project Working Group. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(6):1538–51. doi: 10.1086/514153.

  10. Klastersky J, de Naurois J, Rolston K, et al. Management of Febrile Neutropaenia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl 5):v111–v118. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw325.

  11. Homsi J, Walsh D, Panta R, et al. Infectious complications of advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8(6):487–92.

  12. Zembower TR. Epidemiology of infections in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res. 2014;161:43–89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04220-6_2.

  13. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on clinical evaluation of diagnostic agents. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500003580.pdf. (accessed 30.07.2019).

  14. Павлушкина Л.В., Черневская Е.А., Дмитриева И.Б., Белобородова Н.В. Биомаркеры в клинической практике. Поликлиника. 2013;3:10–4.

    [Pavlushkina LV, Chernevskaya EA, Dmitrieva IB, Beloborodova NV. Biomarkers in clinical practice. Poliklinika. 2013;3:10–4. (In Russ)]

  15. Sbrana A, Torchio M, Comolli G, et al. Use of procalcitonin in clinical oncology: a literature review. New Microbiol. 2016;39(3):174–80.

  16. Pierrakos C, Vincent JV. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R15. doi: 10.1186/cc8872.

  17. Kustan P, Horvath-Szalai Z, Muhl D. Nonconventional Markers of Sepsis. 2017;28(2):122–33.

  18. Colak A, Yilmaz C, Toprak B, Aktogu S. Procalcitonin and Crp as biomarkers in discrimination of community-acquired pneumonia and exacerbation of COPD. J Med Biochem. 2017;36:122–6. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0011.

  19. Gao LQ, Liu XH, Zhang DH, et al. Early diagnosis of bacterial infection in patients with septicopyemia by laboratory analysis of PCT, CRP and IL-6. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(6):3479–83. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4417.

  20. Povoa P, Coelho L, Almeida, et al. Early identification of intensive care unit-acquired infections with daily monitoring of C-reactive protein: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R63. doi: 10.1186/cc4892.

  21. Morley JJ, Kushner I. Serum C-reactive protein levels in disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1982;389:(1):406–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb22153.x.

  22. Palmiere C, Augsburger M. Markers for sepsis diagnosis in the forensic setting: state of the art. Croat Med J. 2014;55(2):103–14. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.103.

  23. Meisner M, Tschaikowsky K, Palmers T. Procalcitonin and CRP in septic shock: Inflammatory parameters with different kinetics. Intens Care Med. 1996;22(S1):s13. doi: 10.1007/BF01921187.

  24. Samraj RS, Zingarelli B, Wong HR. Role of biomarkers in sepsis care. Shock. 2013;40(5):358–65. doi: 10.1097/Shk.0b013e3182a66bd6.

  25. Fujita MQ, Zhu B-L, Ishida K, et al. Serum C-reactive protein levels in postmortem blood – an analysis with special reference to the cause of death and survival time. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;130(2–3):160–6. doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00381-X.

  26. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(12):1805–12. doi: 10.1172/jci18921.

  27. Duzenli KD, Ozdemir ZC, Bor O. Evaluation of febrile neutropenic attacks of pediatric hematology-oncology patients. Turk Pediatr Ars. 2017;52(4):213–20. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2017.5312.

  28. Pineda-Roman M, Barlogie B, Tricot G, et al. High-dose melphalan-based autotransplants for multiple myeloma: the Arkansas experience since 1989 in 3077 patients. Cancer. 2008;112(8):1754–64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23327.

  29. Kollu V, Mott SL, Khan R, et al. C-Reactive Protein Monitoring Predicts Neutropenic Fever Following Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma. Cureus. 2018;10(7):e2945. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2945.

  30. Ortega M, Rovira M, Almela M, et al. Measurement of C-reactive protein in adults with febrile neutropenia after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33(7):741–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704409.

  31. Schots R, Kaufman L, Van Riet I, et al. Monitoring of C-reactive protein after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation identifies patients at risk of severe transplant-related complications and mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;22(1):79–85. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701286.

  32. Sato M, Nakasone H, Wada H, et al. Prediction of infectious events by the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Transplant Infect Dis. 2013;15(4):E169–E171. doi: 10.1111/tid.12102.

  33. Massaro K, Costa SF. Role of Biomarkers as Predictors of Infection and Death in Neutropenic Febrile Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2015;7(1):e2015059. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2015.059.

  34. Sato M, Nakasone H, Oshima K, et al. Prediction of transplant-related complications by C-reactive protein levels before hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(5):698–702. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.193.

  35. Pavlu J, Kew AK, Taylor-Roberts B, et al. Optimizing patient selection for myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Blood. 2010;115(2):4018–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-263624.

  36. Wang XS, Shi Q, Shah ND, et al. Inflammatory markers and development of symptom burden in patients with multiple myeloma during autologous stem cell transplantation. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(5):1366–74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2442.

  37. Fassas AB, Miceli MH, Grazzlutti M, et al. Serial measurement of serum C-reactive protein levels can identify patients at risk for severe complications following autologous stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005;46(8):1159–61. doi: 10.1080/10428190500086121.

  38. Teachey DT, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, et al. Identification of predictive biomarkers for cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(6):664–79. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-0040.

  39. Maruna P, Nedelnikova K, Gurlich R. Physiology and genetics of procalcitonin. Physiol Res. 2000;49(Suppl 1):S57–61.

  40. Becker KL, Snider R, Nylen ES. Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):941–52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165BABB.

  41. Reinhart K, Meisner M, Brunkhorst FM. Markers for sepsis diagnosis: what is useful? Crit Care Clin. 2006;22(3):503–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2006.03.003.

  42. Picariello C, Lazzeri C, Valente S, et al. Procalcitonin in acute cardiac patients. Intern Emerg Med. 2011;6(3):245–52. doi: 10.1007/s11739-010-0462-x.

  43. Reinhart K, Bauer M, Riedelmann NC, et al. New approaches to sepsis: molecular diagnostics and biomarkers. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(4):609–34. doi: 10.1128/cmr.0001612.

  44. Assicot M, Gendrel D, Carsin H, et al. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet. 1993;341(8844):515–8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90277-n.

  45. Wu CW, Wu JY, Chen CK, et al. Does procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, or interleukin-6 test have a role in the diagnosis of severe infection in patients with febrile neutropenia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(10):2863–72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2650-8.

  46. Schuttrumpf S, Binder L, Hagemann T, et al. Utility of procalcitonin concentration in the evaluation of patients with malignant diseases and elevated C-reactive protein plasma concentrations. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(3):468–73. doi: 10.1086/505394.

  47. Shomali W, Hachem R, Chaftari AM, et al. Can procalcitonin distinguish infectious fever from tumor-related fever in non-neutropenic cancer patients? Cancer. 2012;118(23):5823–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27602.

  48. Meidani M, Khorvash F, Abolghasemi H, et al. Procalcitonin and quantitative C-reactive protein role in the early diagnosis of sepsis in patients with febrile neutropenia. South Asian J Cancer. 2013;2(4):216–9. doi: 10.4103/2278-330x.119913.

  49. Ahn S, Lee YS, Lim KS, et al. Adding Procalcitonin to the MASCC risk-index score could improve risk stratification of patients with febrile neutropenia. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(8):2303–8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1787-6.

  50. Chaftari AM, Hachem R, Reitzel R, et al. Role of Procalcitonin and Interleukin-6 in Predicting Cancer, and Its Progression Independent of Infection. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0130999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130999.

  51. Jimeno A, Garcia-Velasco A, Val del O, et al. Assessment of Procalcitonin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in Patients with Solid Tumors and Febrile Neutropenia. Cancer. 2004;100(11):2462–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20275.

  52. Carnino L, Betteto S, Loiacono M, et al. Procalcitonin as a predictive marker of infections in chemoinduced neutropenia. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(4):611–5. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0699-9.

  53. Diness LV, Maraldo MV, Mortensen CE, et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as markers of bacterial infection in patients with solid tumors. Dan Med J. 2014;61(12):A4984.

  54. Giamarellou H, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Repoussis P, et al. Potential use of procalcitonin as a diagnostic criterion in febrile neutropenia: experience from a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(7):628–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00883.x.

  55. Persson L, Engervall P, Magnuson A, et al. Use of inflammatory markers for early detection of bacteraemia in patients with febrile neutropenia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(5):365–71. doi: 10.1080/00365540410020217.

  56. Ruokonen E, Nousiainen T, Pulkki K, et al. Procalcitonin concentrations in patients with neutropenic fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18(4):283–5. doi: 10.1007/s100960050277.

  57. Robinson JO, Lamoth F, Bally F, et al. Monitoring procalcitonin in febrile neutropenia: what is its utility for initial diagnosis of infection and reassessment in persistent fever? PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018886.

  58. Patout M, Salaun M, Brunel V, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum procalcitonin concentrations in primary lung cancers. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(18):263–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.09.002.

  59. Scheinpflug K, Schalk E, Grabert E, et al. Procalcitonin is not useful to discriminate between infectious and noninfectious CrP elevations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36(9):1117–8. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.134.

  60. Yaegashi Y, Sato N, Suzuki Y, et al. Evaluation of a newly identified soluble CD14 subtype as a marker for sepsis. J Infect Chemother. 2005;11(5):234–8. doi: 10.1007/s10156-005-0400-4.

  61. Shirakawa K, Naitou K, Hirose J, et al. The new sepsis marker, sCD14-ST, induction mechanism in the rabbit sepsis models. Crit Care. 2010;14(Suppl 2):P19. doi: 10.1186/cc9122.

  62. Shozushima T, Takahashi G, Matsumoto N, et al. Usefulness of presepsin (sCD14-ST) measurements as a marker for the diagnosis and severity of sepsis that satisfied diagnostic criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17(6):764–9. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0254-x.

  63. Endo S, Suzuki Y, Takahashi G, et al. Usefulness of presepsin in the diagnosis of sepsis in a multicenter prospective study. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(6):891–7. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0435-2.

  64. Urbonas V, Eidukaite A, Tamuliene I. The predictive value of soluble biomarkers (CD14 subtype, interleukin-2 receptor, human leucocyte antigen-G) and procalcitonin in the detection of bacteremia and sepsis in pediatric oncology patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Cytokine. 2013;62(1):34–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.02.030.

  65. Olad E, Sedighi I, Mehrvar A, et al. Presepsin (scd14) as a marker of serious bacterial infections in chemotherapy induced severe neutropenia. Iran J Pediatr. 2014;24(6):715–22.

  66. Korpelainen S, Intke C, Hamalainen S, et al. Soluble CD14 as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Hematological Patients with Febrile Neutropenia. Dis Mark. 2017;2017:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2017/9805609.

  67. Koh H, Aimoto M, Katayama T, et al. Diagnostic value of levels of presepsin (soluble CD14-subtype) in febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological disorders. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22(7):466–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.04.002.

  68. Stoma I, Karpov I, Uss A, et al. Diagnostic value of sepsis biomarkers in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in a condition of high prevalence of gram-negative pathogens. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017;10(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2016.09.002.

  69. Ebisawa K, Koya J, Nakazaki K, et al. Usefulness of presepsin for early detection of infections in patients with hematologic disorders. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;486:374–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.032.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Biochemical Markers of Infectious Complications of High-Dose Therapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphoproliferative Diseases

COMPLICATIONS OF ANTITUMOR TREATMENT , , , ,

VO Sarzhevskii, YuN Dubinina, VYa Mel’nichenko

NI Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center under the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 70 Nizhnyaya Pervomaiskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105203

For correspondence: Vladislav Olegovich Sarzhevskii, PhD, 70 Nizhnyaya Pervomaiskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105203; Tel: +7(495)603-72-18; e-mail: vladsar@pochta.ru

For citation: Sarzhevskii VO, Dubinina YuN, Mel’nichenko VYa. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Biochemical Markers of Infectious Complications of High-Dose Therapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphoproliferative Diseases. Clinical oncohematology. 2017;10(1):113–9 (In Russ).

DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2017-10-1-113-119

ABSTRACT

Aim. To evaluate diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and presepsin (PSP) in patients with malignant lymphoproliferative disorders after a high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HSCT.

Methods. 28 patients were included in the study (20 women and 8 men; 12 of them with Hodgkin’s lymphoma, 6 with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, and 10 with multiple myeloma). The median age was 40 years (23–66 years). The conditioning regimens were CBV, BEAM or melphalan 200 mg/m2. PSP, PCT and CRP levels were evaluated on the day of admission (DA), D+1, D+3, D+7 and on the day of discharge (DD). Depending on the presence of infectious complications, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — patients without complications (n = 12), group 2 — patients with complications (n = 16). In group 2 there were 15 patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) and 1 with sepsis.

Results. The median (range) of FN development was 5.5 days. Median CRP level on the DA and the DD in group 1 was 2.25 mg/l (0.6–20.4) and 14.85 mg/l (3.7–50), respectively (p = 0.001), while in group 2 it was 3.2 mg/l (0.2–53) and 19.7 mg/l (5.1–152.2), respectively (p = 0.025). However, CRP did not significantly differ between groups 1 and 2 at any point of analysis. The study also demonstrated a significant increase in the PCT levels in both groups after allo-HSCT. Median PCT level on the DA and the DD in group 1 was 0.023 ng/ml (0.02–0.112) and 0.07 ng/mL (0.02–0.356), respectively (p = 0.04), and in group 2 — 0.039 ng/ml (0.02–0.158) and 0.106 ng/mL (0.045–3.67), respectively (p = 0.001). Comparison of PCT levels on study days demonstrated no significant difference between groups. On the DA the median PSP level in group 1 was 166.5 pg/ml (77.2–476), on the DD it was 199 pg/ml (90–298) (p = 0.78). Median PSP levels in group 2 on the DA (129 pg/ml, range 84.2–501) and also on the DD (288.5 pg/ml, range 83.4–1345) were significantly different (p = 0.03). In the comparative analysis of PSP in groups 1 and 2, there were no significant differences on the DA and on the D+1. Significant difference in PSP levels between the analyzed groups was on the D+3, D+7 and on the DA.

Conclusion. The preliminary data showed that PSP is the most sensitive marker of infectious complications in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases after auto-HSCT.

Keywords: high-dose chemotherapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation, infection, presepsin, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein.

Received: July 28, 2016

Accepted: December 10, 2016

Read in PDF (RUS)pdficon

REFERENCES

  1. Bhatt VR, Loberiza FR Jr, Jing H, et al. Mortality patterns among recipients of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for lymphoma and myeloma in the past three decades. Clin Lymph Myel Leuk. 2015;15(7):409–15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.02.024.
  2. Zhang W, Zhao Q, Huang H. Febrile neutropenic infection occurred in cancer patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2015;47(2):523–7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.013.
  3. Schmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, et al. Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin’s disease: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9323):2065-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08938-9.
  4. Massaro K, Macedo R, de Castro B, et al. Risk factor for death in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: are biomarkers useful to foresee the prognosis in this population of patients? Infection. 2014;42(6):1023–32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0685-2.
  5. Saarinen U, Strandjord S, Warkentin P, et al. Differentiation of presumed sepsis from acute graft-versus-host disease by C-reactive protein and serum total IgE in bone marrow transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1987;44(4):540–6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198710000-00017.
  6. Bonig H, Schneider DT, Sprock I, et al. ‘Sepsis’ and multi-organ failure: predictors of poor outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25(Suppl 2):S32–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702350.
  7. Yonemori K, Kanda Y, Yamamoto R, et al. Clinical value of serial measurement of serum C-reactive protein level in neutropenic patients. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;41(5–6):607–14. doi: 10.3109/10428190109060351.
  8. Hamalainen S, Kuittinen T, Matinlauri I, et al. Severe sepsis in autologous stem cell transplant recipients: microbiological aetiology, risk factors and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(1):14–20. doi: 10.1080/00365540802454706.
  9. Assicot M, Bohuon C, Gendrel D, et al. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet. 1993;341(8844):515–8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90277-n.
  10. Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, et al. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(2):206–17. doi: 10.1086/421997.
  11. Sbrana A, Torchio M, Comolli G, et al. Use of procalcitonin in clinical oncology: a literature review. New Microbiol. 2016;39(3):174–80.
  12. Massaro KS, Costa SF, Leone C, et al. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as severe systemic infection markers in febrile neutropenic adults. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7(1):137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-137.
  13. Giamarellou H, Giamarellos-Bourboulis E, Repoussis P, et al. Potential use of procalcitonin as a diagnostic criterion in febrile neutropenia: experience from a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(7):628–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00883.x.
  14. Koivula I, Hamalainen S, Jantunen E, et al. Elevated procalcitonin predicts Gram-negative sepsis in haematological patients with febrile neutropenia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43(6–7):471–8. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.554855.
  15. Camussi G, Mariano F, Biancone L, et al. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein and CD14 modulate the synthesis of platelet-activating factor by human monocytes and mesangial and endothelial cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 1995;155:316–24.
  16. Shozushima T, Takahashi G, Matsumoto N, et al. Usefulness of presepsin (sCD14-ST) measurements as a marker for the diagnosis and severity of sepsis that satisfied diagnostic criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17(6):764–9. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0254-x.
  17. Olad E, Sedighi I, Mehrvar A, et al. Presepsin (scd14) as a marker of serious bacterial infections in chemotherapy induced severe neutropenia. Iran J Pediatr. 2014;24(6):715–22.
  18. Koh H, Aimoto M, Katayama T, et al. Diagnostic value of levels of presepsin (soluble CD14-subtype) in febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological disorders. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22(7):466–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.04.002.
  19. Urbonas V, Eidukaite A, Tamuliene I. The predictive value of soluble biomarkers (CD14 subtype, interleukin-2 receptor, human leucocyte antigen-G) and procalcitonin in the detection of bacteremia and sepsis in pediatric oncology patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Cytokine. 2013;62(1):34–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.02.030.
  20. Freifeld GA, Bow JE, Sepkowitz AK, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4): e56–93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir073.