mucositis

Supportive (Maintenance) Therapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Main Principles and New Perspectives

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION , , , , , ,

VP Pop, OA Rukavitsyn

NN Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, 3 Gospitalnaya sq., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105229

For correspondence: Vasilii Petrovich Pop, PhD, 3 Gospitalnaya sq., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105229; Tel.: +7(903)178-94-12; Fax: 8(499)263-07-39; e-mail: vasiliypop@mail.ru

For citation: Pop VP, Rukavitsyn OA. Supportive (Maintenance) Therapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Main Principles and New Perspectives. Clinical oncohematology. 2017;10(4):501–13 (In Russ).

DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2017-10-4-501-513

ABSTRACT

Supportive (maintenance) therapy (ST) for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is undergoing significant changes and development. The aim of the review was to summarise the basic data on methods and perspective of ST for HSCT and to analyse new opportunities and alternative approaches to enhance the antitumor potential of HSCT. The need for ST is constantly growing as a result of significant increase in the number of performed HSCT and an increase in patient survival. The review highlights traditional methods of ST which allowed to boost the success of HSCT: antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral preventive treatment. The authors discuss preventing toxicity of dimethyl sulfoxide (cryopreserving agent); understudied aspects of vaccination of HSCT recipients, and effects on microbiota. The study demonstrates that many of the classic recommendations of ST are being constantly updated given the wide variability of approaches not only to post-transplant monitoring, but also to empirical antibiotic therapy and the use of hematopoietic growth factors and the appropriateness of the correction of the microbiota, constraints of the external environment and social contacts. Currently, HSCT is becoming more available, in conditions close to the out-patient clinics, which leads to improved outcomes and significantly decreases the cost of hospital stay. The future improvement of the cost effectiveness and quality of ST will be possible due to health information technologies, and digital infrastructure between doctor and patient. We report our own experience of ST for allo-HSCT in 19 patients and for auto-HSCT in 82 patients, and implementation of auto-HSCT in non-insulated wards without HEPA-filtration. The literature review shows both the increased demand for the various methods of ST at HSCT and its increasing efficiency. Despite the lack of uniform standards, introduction of new approaches of ST should significantly improve HSCT outcomes.

Keywords: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, supportive therapy, mucositis, antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral preventive measures, microbiota, posttransplant complications.

Received: March 26, 2017

Accepted: May 22, 2017

Read in PDF

REFERENCES

  1. McCarthy PL, Hahn T, Hassebroek A, et al. Trends in Use of and Survival after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in North America, 1995-2005: Significant Improvement in Survival for Lymphoma and Myeloma during a Period of Increasing Recipient Age. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(7):1116–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.04.027.
  2. Auner HW, Szydlo R, Hoek J, et al. Trends in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in Europe: increased use and improved outcomes in elderly patients in recent years. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(2):209–15. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.255.
  3. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Bader P, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe 2014: more than 40 000 transplants annually. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(6):786–92. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.20.
  4. Farquhar C, Marjoribanks J, Basser R, Lethaby A. High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;3:CD003139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003139.pub2.
  5. Farquhar C, Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Azhar M. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;5:CD003139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003139.pub3.
  6. Gratwohl A, Pasquini MC, Aljurf M, et al. One million haemopoietic stem-cell transplants: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(3):e91–100. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00028-9.
  7. Majhail NS, Tao L, Bredeson C, et al. Prevalence of hematopoietic cell transplant survivors in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(10):1498–501. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.07.020.
  8. Savani BN. How Can We Improve Life Expectancy and Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation? Semin Hematol. 2012;49(1):1–3. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2011.10.014.
  9. Rubio MT, Savani BN, Labopin M, et al. Impact of conditioning intensity in T-replete haplo-identical stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia: a report from the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0248-3.
  10. Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2014;120(10):1453–61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28592.
  11. Wang L, Gu Z, Zhai R, et al. Efficacy of oral cryotherapy on oral mucositis prevention in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS One. 2015;10(5):e0128763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128763.
  12. Svanberg A, Оhrn K, Birgegard G. Caphosol® mouthwash gives no additional protection against oral mucositis compared to cryotherapy alone in stem cell transplantation. A pilot study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015;19(1):50–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.07.011.
  13. Spielberger R, Stiff P, Bensinger W, et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2590–8. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa040125.
  14. Stiff PJ, Emmanouilides C, Bensinger WI, et al. Palifermin reduces patient-reported mouth and throat soreness and improves patient functioning in the hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(33):5186–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.8340.
  15. Abidi MH, Agarwal R, Tageja N, et al. A phase I dose-escalation trial of high-dose melphalan with palifermin for cytoprotection followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma with normal renal function. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(1):56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.003.
  16. Tsirigotis P, Triantafyllou K, Girkas K, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor is effective in the prevention of intestinal mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic SCT: a video-capsule endoscopy study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;42(5):337–43. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.168.
  17. Nooka AK, Johnson HR, Kaufman JL, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of palifermin to prevent mucositis among patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(6):852–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.02.025.
  18. Bensinger WI, Becker PS, Gooley TA, et al. A randomized study of melphalan 200 mg/m2 vs 280 mg/m2 as a preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing auto-SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(1):67–71. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.211.
  19. Hari P, Aljitawi OS, Arce-Lara C, et al. A Phase IIb, Multicenter, Open-Label, Safety, and Efficacy Study of High-Dose, Propylene Glycol-Free Melphalan Hydrochloride for Injection (EVOMELA) for Myeloablative Conditioning in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(12):2100–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.08.026.
  20. Blijlevens N, Schwenkglenks M, Bacon P, et al. Prospective oral mucositis audit: oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose melphalan or BEAM conditioning chemotherapy — European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Mucositis Advisory Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(9):1519–25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6028.
  21. Martino M, Tripepi G, Messina G, et al. A phase II, single-arm, prospective study of bendamustine plus melphalan conditioning for second autologous stem cell transplantation in de novo multiple myeloma patients through a tandem transplant strategy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(9):1197–203. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.94.
  22. Mark TM, Reid W, Niesvizky R, et al. A phase 1 study of bendamustine and melphalan conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(5):831–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.02.013.
  23. Costa LJ, Micallef IN, Inwards DJ, et al. Effect of the dose per body weight of conditioning chemotherapy on severity of mucositis and risk of relapse after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2008;143(2):268–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07342.x.
  24. Ullmann AJ, Schmidt-Hieber M, Bertz H, et al. Infectious diseases in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prevention and prophylaxis strategy guidelines 2016. Ann Hematol. 2016;95(9):1435–55. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2711-1.
  25. Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD004386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004386.pub3.
  26. Cruciani M, Malena M, Bosco O, et al. Reappraisal with meta-analysis of the addition of Gram-positive prophylaxis to fluoroquinolone in neutropenic patients. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(22):4127–37. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.234.
  27. Kimura S, Akahoshi Y, Nakano H, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Infect. 2014;69(1):13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.02.013.
  28. Taur Y, Jenq RR, Perales M-A, et al. The effects of intestinal tract bacterial diversity on mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2014;124(7):1174–82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-554725.
  29. Ullmann AJ, Akova M, Herbrecht R, et al. ESCMID* *This guideline was presented in part at ECCMID 2011. European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: adults with haematological malignancies and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(Suppl 7):53–67. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12041.
  30. Deo SS, Gottlieb DJ. Adoptive T-cell therapy for fungal infections in haematology patients. Clin Transl Immunol. 2015;4(8):e40. doi: 10.1038/cti.2015.16.
  31. Parida SK, Poiret T, Zhenjiang L, et al. T-Cell Therapy: Options for Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(Suppl 3):S217–24. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ615.
  32. Dotti G, Gottschalk S, Savoldo B, Brenner MK. Design and Development of Therapies using Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Expressing T cells. Immunol Rev. 2013;257(1):107–26. doi: 10.1111/imr.12131.
  33. Kumaresan PR, Manuri PR, Albert ND, et al. Bioengineering T cells to target carbohydrate to treat opportunistic fungal infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(29):10660–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312789111.
  34. Kumaresan PR, Albert N, Singh H, et al. Bioengineered Dectin-1 CAR+ T cells to control invasive fungal infection. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(1 Supplt): Abstract 193. doi: 10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR15-A193.
  35. Heslop HE, Slobod KS, Pule MA, et al. Long-term outcome of EBV-specific T-cell infusions to prevent or treat EBV-related lymphoproliferative disease in transplant recipients. Blood. 2010;115(5):925–35. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-239186.
  36. Leen AM, Myers GD, Sili U, et al. Monoculture-derived T lymphocytes specific for multiple viruses expand and produce clinically relevant effects in immunocompromised individuals. Nat Med. 2006;12(10):1160–6. doi: 10.1038/nm1475.
  37. Leen AM, Heslop HE, Brenner MK. Antiviral T-cell therapy. Immunol Rev. 2014;258(1):12–29. doi: 10.1111/imr.12138.
  38. Krebs K, Bottinger N, Huang L-R, et al. T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor that binds hepatitis B virus envelope proteins control virus replication in mice. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(2):456–65. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.047.
  39. Sautto GA, Wisskirchen K, Clementi N, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells redirected against hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 glycoprotein. Gut. 2016;65(3):512–23. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308316.
  40. Ljungman P, Cordonnier C, Einsele H, et al. Vaccination of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44(8):521–6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.263.
  41. Galmes A, Gutierrez A, Sampol A, et al. Long-term hematological reconstitution and clinical evaluation of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after cryopreservation of cells with 5% and 10% dimethylsulfoxide at 80 degrees C in a mechanical freezer. Haematologica. 2007;92(7):986–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11060.
  42. Detry G, Calvet L, Straetmans N, et al. Impact of uncontrolled freezing and long-term storage of peripheral blood stem cells at -80°C on haematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation. Report from two centres. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(6):780–5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.53.
  43. Morris C, de Wreede L, Scholten M, et al. Should the standard dimethyl sulfoxide concentration be reduced? Results of a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation prospective noninterventional study on usage and side effects of dimethyl sulfoxide. Transfusion. 2014;54(10):2514–22. doi: 10.1111/trf.12759.
  44. Shu Z, Heimfeld S, Gao D. Hematopoietic SCT with cryopreserved grafts: adverse reactions after transplantation and cryoprotectant removal before infusion. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(4):469–76. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.152.
  45. Martino M, Morabito F, Messina G, et al. Fractionated infusions of cryopreserved stem cells may prevent DMSO-induced major cardiac complications in graft recipients. Haematologica. 1996;81(1):59–61.
  46. Hechler G, Weide R, Heymanns J, et al. Storage of noncryopreserved periphered blood stem cells for transplantation. Ann Hematol. 1996;72(5):303–6. doi: 10.1007/s002770050176.
  47. Ruiz-Arguelles GJ, Ruiz-Arguelles A, Perez-Romano B, et al. Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells autotransplants for hematological malignancies can be performed entirely on an outpatient basis. Am J Hematol. 1998;58(3):161–4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8652(199807)58:3<161::aid-ajh1>3.0.co;2-p.
  48. Gomez-Almaguer D. The simplification of the SCT procedures in developing countries has resulted in cost-lowering and availability to more patients. Int J Hematol. 2002;76(Suppl 1):380–2. doi: 10.1007/bf03165288.
  49. Lopez-Otero A, Ruiz-Delgado GJ, Ruiz-Arguelles GJ. A simplified method for stem cell autografting in multiple myeloma: a single institution experience. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44(11):715–9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.71.
  50. Schroeder T, Fenk R, Saure C, et al. The Mexican way: a feasible approach to avoid DMSO toxicity. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46(3):469–71. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.140.
  51. Ruiz-Delgado GJ, Ruiz-Arguelles GJ. A Mexican way to cope with stem cell grafting. Hematol Amst Neth. 2012;17(Suppl 1):S195–7. doi: 10.1179/102453312X13336169157130.
  52. Wannesson L, Panzarella T, Mikhael J, Keating A. Feasibility and safety of autotransplants with noncryopreserved marrow or peripheral blood stem cells: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(4):623–32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm069.
  53. Matsumoto N, Yoshizawa H, Kagamu H, et al. Successful liquid storage of peripheral blood stem cells at subzero non-freezing temperature. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;30(11):777–84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703692.
  54. Savage DC. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31(1):107–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.000543.
  55. Уголев А.М. Теория адекватного питания и трофология. СПб.: Наука, 1991. 272 с.[Ugolev AM. Teoriya adekvatnogo pitaniya i trofologiya. (The theory of adequate nutrition and throphology.) Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ; 1991. 272 p. (In Russ)]
  56. Manzo VE, Bhatt AS. The human microbiome in hematopoiesis and hematologic disorders. Blood. 2015;126(3):311–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-574392.
  57. Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G, et al. The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science. 2013;342(6161):971–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1240537.
  58. Daillere R, Vetizou M, Waldschmitt N, et al. Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects. Immunity. 2016;45(4):931–43. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.009.
  59. Pflug N, Kluth S, Vehreschild JJ, et al. Efficacy of antineoplastic treatment is associated with the use of antibiotics that modulate intestinal microbiota. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(6):e1150399. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1150399.
  60. Alexander JL, Wilson ID, Teare J, et al. Gut microbiota modulation of chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(6):356–65. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.20.
  61. Niesvizky R, Jayabalan DS, Christos PJ, et al. BiRD (Biaxin [clarithromycin]/Revlimid [lenalidomide]/dexamethasone) combination therapy results in high complete- and overall-response rates in treatment-naive symptomatic multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111(3):1101–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-090258.
  62. Mark TM, Boyer A, Rossi AC, et al. ClaPD (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. ASH Annu Meeting Abstracts. 2012;120(21):77.
  63. Ishimatsu Y, Mukae H, Matsumoto K, et al. Two cases with pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma successfully treated with clarithromycin. Chest. 2010;138(3):730–3. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2358.
  64. Ohe M, Hashino S. A case of follicular B-cell lymphoma treated using clarithromycin. Korean J Hematol. 2011;46(3):203–6. doi: 10.5045/kjh.2011.46.3.203.
  65. Ohe M, Hashino S, Hattori A. Successful treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with clarithromycin and prednisolone. Korean J Hematol. 2012;47(4):293–7. doi: 10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.293.
  66. Ohe M, Hashino S. Successful treatment of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma with clarithromycin. Blood Res. 2016;51(2):139–42. doi: 10.5045/br.2016.51.2.139.
  67. Storb R, Gyurkocza B, Storer BE, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following minimal intensity conditioning: predicting acute graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-tumor effects. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(5):792–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.02.006.
  68. Andermann TM, Rezvani A, Bhatt AS. Microbiota Manipulation with Prebiotics and Probiotics in Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016;11(1):19–28. doi: 10.1007/s11899-016-0302-9.
  69. Staffas A, da Silva MB, van den Brink MRM. The intestinal microbiota in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant and graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017;129(8):927–33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-691394.
  70. van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, et al. Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(5):407–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA1205037.
  71. Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(16):1539–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMRA1403772.
  72. Kakihana K, Fujioka Y, Suda W, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for patients with steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease of the gut. Blood. 2016;128(16):2083–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-717652.
  73. Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Oshima K, , et al. Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature. 2013;500(7461):232–6. doi: 10.1038/nature12331.
  74. Саржевский В.О. Оценка токсических эффектов высокодозной химиотерапии с трансплантацией периферических стволовых гемопоэтических клеток у больных лимфопролиферативными заболеваниями: Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук: М., 2016. 52 с.[Sarzhevskii VO. Otsenka toksicheskikh effektov vysokodoznoi khimioterapii s transplantatsiei perifericheskikh stvolovykh gemopoeticheskikh kletok u bol’nykh limfoproliferativnymi zabolevaniyami. (Assessment Toxicity Effects of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Transplantation of Peripheral Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Patients with Lymphoproliferative Diseases.) [dissertation] Moscow; 2016. 52 p. (In Russ)]
  75. Lee SJ, Astigarraga CC, Eapen M, et al. Variation in Supportive Care Practices in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(11):1231–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.08.008.
  76. Peters WP, Ross M, Vredenburgh JJ, et al. The use of intensive clinic support to permit outpatient autologous bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 1994;21(4 Suppl 7):25–31.
  77. Faucher C, Le Corroller Soriano AG, Esterni B, et al. Randomized study of early hospital discharge following autologous blood SCT: medical outcomes and hospital costs. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;47(4):549–55. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.126.
  78. Graff TM, Singavi AK, Schmidt W, et al. Safety of Outpatient Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(7):947–53. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.46.
  79. Solomon SR, Matthews RH, Barreras AM, et al. Outpatient myeloablative allo-SCT: a comprehensive approach yields decreased hospital utilization and low TRM. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(3):468–75. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.234.
  80. Bashey A, Zhang X, Brown S, et al. Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Performed without Routine Inpatient Admission: A Single Center Experience of 462 Consecutive Patients. Blood. 2016;128(22):661.
  81. Baumann FT, Kraut L, Schule K, et al. A controlled randomized study examining the effects of exercise therapy on patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(2):355–62. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.163.
  82. Steinberg A, Asher A, Bailey C, Fu JB. The role of physical rehabilitation in stem cell transplantation patients. Supp Care Cancer. 2015;23(8):2447–60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2744-3.
  83. Chiffelle R, Kenny K. Exercise for fatigue management in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(3):241–4. doi: 10.1188/13.CJON.241-244.
  84. Chung HM, Lyckholm LJ, Smith TJ. Palliative care in BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;43(4):265–73. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.436.
  85. Rioth MJ, Warner J, Savani BN, Jagasia M. Next-generation long-term transplant clinics: improving resource utilization and the quality of care through health information technology. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(1):34–40. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.210.
  86. Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, et al. Development of the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(9):dju244. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju244.
  87. SABCS 2016: IBM Watson for Oncology Platform Shows High Degree of Concordance with Physician Recommendations. The ASCO Post [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ascopost.com/News/44214. Accessed 31.07.2017.

Gastrointestinal Complications after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Oncohematological Patients

COMPLICATIONS OF ANTITUMOR TREATMENT , ,

V.O. Sarzhevskiy, E.G. Smirnova, V.Yа. Melnichenko

N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Centre of RF MH, Moscow, Russian Federation

For citation: Sarzhevskiy V.O., Smirnova E.G., Mel’nichenko V.Ya. Gastrointestinal Complications after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Oncohematological Patients. Klin. onkogematol. 2014; 7(3): 343–53 (In Russ.).

ABSTRACT

Different gastrointestinal disorders with different degrees of severity are diagnosed in almost all oncohematological patients receiving the high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous bone marrow transplantation (transplantation of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells). The mentioned disorders (mucositis) significantly impair the quality of life, promote the development of infectious complications, and, in some cases, can cause a lethal outcome. Authors emphasize the importance of GIT disorders due to HDC with autologous bone marrow transplantation, present etiological and pathogenetic factors of mucosites and give a detailed description of the clinical evaluation, test methods, prevention and treatment of such transplantation complications in oncohematological patients.

Keywords: high dose chemotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, mucositis.

Address correspondence to: vladsar@pochta.ru

Accepted: May 26, 2014

Read in PDF  (RUS)pdficon

REFERENCES

  1. Damon L., Rugo H., Tolaney S. et al. Cytoreduction of lymphoid malignancies and mobilization of blood hematopoietic progenitor cells with high doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide plus filgrastim. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006; 12(3): 316–24.
  2. Bishton M.J., Lush R.J., Byrne J.L. et al. Ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin is an effective combined salvage and peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease. Br. J. Haematol. 2007; 136(5): 752–61.
  3. Milone G., Leotta S., Battiato K. et al. Intermediate dose etoposide plus G-CSF 16 g/kg is more effective than cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) plus G-CSF 10 g/kg in PBSC mobilization of lymphoma patients. Leuk. Lymphoma 2007; 48(10): 1950–60.
  4. Lu H., Li J.Y., Ge Z. et al. High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colonystimulating factor for mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells in patients with hematologic malignancies. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2006; 14(2): 397–9.
  5. Bolwell B.J., Kalaycio M., Sobecks R. et al. A multivariable analysis of factors influencing mucositis after autologous progenitor cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 30(9): 587–91.
  6. Grazziutti M.L., Dong L., Miceli M.H. et al. Oral mucositis in myeloma patients undergoing melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation: incidence, risk factors and a severity predictive model. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 38(7): 501–6.
  7. Blijlevens N., Schwenkglenks M., Bacon P. et al. Prospective oral mucositis audit: oral mucositis in patients receiving high-dose melphalan or BEAM conditioning chemotherapy—European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Mucositis Advisory Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008; 26(9): 1519–25.
  8. Blanes M., Lahuerta J.J., Gonzalez J.D. et al. Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013; 19(1): 69–74.
  9. Jantunen E., Kuittinen T., Nousiainen T. et al. BEAC or BEAM for high-dose therapy in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma? A single centre analysis on toxicity and efficacy. Leuk. Lymphoma 2003; 44(7): 1151–8.
  10. Jo J.C., Kang B.W., Jang G. et al. BEAC or BEAM high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: comparative analysis of efficacy and toxicity. Ann. Hematol. 2008; 87(1): 43–8.
  11. Kim J.E., Lee D.H., Yoo C. et al. BEAM or BuCyE high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a single center comparative analysis of efficacy and toxicity. Leuk. Res. 2011; 35(2): 183–7.
  12. Dean R.M., Pohlman B., Sweetenham J.W. et al. Superior survival after replacing oral with intravenous busulfan in autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma with busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide. Br. J. Haematol. 2010; 148(2): 226–34.
  13. Spielberger R., Stiff P., Bensinger W. et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 351(25): 2590–8.
  14. Krishnan A., Palmer J.M., Tsai N.C. et al. Matched-cohort analysis of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation with radioimmunotherapy versus total body irradiation-based conditioning for poor-risk diffuse large cell lymphoma. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18(3): 441–50.
  15. Paris F., Fuks Z., Kang A. et al. Endothelial apoptosis as the primary lesion initiating intestinal radiation damage in mice. Science 2001; 293: 293–7.
  16. Wearing H.J., Sherratt J.A. Keratinocyte growth factor signaling: a mathematical model of dermalepidermal interaction in epidermal wound healing. Math. Biosci. 2000; 165: 41–62.
  17. Sonis S. Pathobiology of oral mucositis: novel insights and opportunities. J. Supp. Oncol. 2007; 5: 3–11.
  18. Wardley A.M., Jayson G.C., Swindell R. et al. Prospective evaluation of oral mucositis in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens and haemopoietic progenitor rescue. Br. J. Haematol. 2000; 110(2): 292–9.
  19. Vokurka S., Bystricka E., Koza V. et al. Higher incidence of chemotherapy induced oral mucositis in females: a supplement of multivariate analysis to a randomized multicentre study. Supp. Care Cancer 2006; 14(9): 974–6.
  20. Hahn T., Zhelnova E., Sucheston L. et al. A deletion polymorphism in glutathione-S-transferase mu (GSTM1) and/or theta (GSTT1) is associated with an increased risk of toxicity after autologous blood and marrow transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010; 16(6): 801–8.
  21. Grazziutti M.L., Dong L., Miceli M.H. et al. Oral mucositis in myeloma patients undergoing melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation: incidence, risk factors and a severity predictive model. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 38(7): 501–6.
  22. Krishna S.G., Zhao W., Grazziutti M.L. et al. Incidence and risk factors for lower alimentary tract mucositis after 1529 courses of chemotherapy in a homogenous population of oncology patients: clinical and research implications. Cancer 2011; 117(3): 648–55.
  23. Bensinger W., Schubert M., Ang K.K. et al. NCCN Task Force Report: prevention and management of mucositis in cancer care. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2008; 6(Suppl. 1): S1–21.
  24. Atkinson K., Champlin R., Ritz J. et al. (eds.) Clinical Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, 2004: 276–7.
  25. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). Published August 9, 2006. Available at: www.ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf.
  26. Forbes G.M., Rule S.A., Herrmann R.P. et al. A prospective study of screening upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy prior to and after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 1995; 25(1): 32–6.
  27. Vishny M.L., Blades E.W., Creger R.J. et al. Role of upper endoscopy in evaluation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Invest. 1994; 12(4): 384–9.
  28. Tsirigotis P., Triantafyllou K., Girkas K. et al. Keratinocyte growth factor is effective in the prevention of intestinal mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic SCT: a video-capsule endoscopy study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008; 42(5): 337–43.
  29. Avivi I., Avraham S., Koren-Michowitz M. et al. Oral integrity and salivary profile in myeloma patients undergoing high-dose therapy followed by autologous SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009; 43(10): 801–6.
  30. Blijlevens N.M., Donnelly J.P., de Pauw B.E. Prospective evaluation of gut mucosal barrier injury following various myeloablative regimens for haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005; 35(7): 707–11.
  31. Johansson J.E., Brune M., Ekman T. The gut mucosa barrier is preserved during allogeneic, haemopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001; 28(8): 737–42.
  32. van Kraaij M.G., Dekker A.W., Verdonck L.F. et al. Infectious gastroenteritis: an uncommon cause of diarrhoea in adult allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 26(3): 299–303.
  33. Chakrabarti S., Collingham K.E., Stevens R.H. et al. Isolation of viruses from stools in stem cell transplant recipients: a prospective surveillance study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(3): 277–82.
  34. Davila M.L. Neutropenic enterocolitis. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2006; 22(1): 44–7.
  35. Ullery B.W., Pieracci F.M., Rodney J.R. et al. Neutropenic enterocolitis. Surg. Infect. (Larchmt.) 2009; 10(3): 307–14.
  36. Arango J.I., Restrepo A., Schneider D.L. et al. Incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea before and after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 37(5): 517–21.
  37. Tomblyn M., Gordon L., Singhal S. et al. Rarity of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: implications for symptomatic management of diarrhea. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 30(8): 517–9.
  38. Avery R., Pohlman B., Adal K. et al. High prevalence of diarrhea but infrequency of documented Clostridium difficile in autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(1): 67–9.
  39. Ramsey D.J., Schey S.A. Cytomegalovirus colitis after autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2000; 110(4): 894–6.
  40. Cohen Y., Paltiel O., Amir G. et al. Unusual cytomegalovirus complications after autologous stem cell transplantation for large B cell lymphoma: massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage followed by a communicating hydrocephalus. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 29(8): 715–6.
  41. MASCC/ISOO evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. http://www.mascc.org/assets/GuidelinesTools.
  42. Yamagata K., Arai C., Sasaki H. et al. The effect of oral management on the severity of oral mucositis during hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 47(5): 725–30. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.171.
  43. Stiff P.J., Emmanouilides C., Bensinger W.I. et al. Palifermin reduces patient-reported mouth and throat soreness and improves patient functioning in the hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation setting. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006; 24(33): 5186–93.
  44. Abidi M.H., Agarwal R., Tageja N. et al. A phase I dose-escalation trial of high-dose melphalan with palifermin for cytoprotection followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma with normal renal function. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013; 19(1): 56–61.
  45. Abidi M.H., Agarwal R., Ayash L. et al. Melphalan 180 mg/m2 can be safely administered as conditioning regimen before an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma patients with creatinine clearance 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or lower with use of palifermin for cytoprotection: results of a phase I trial. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18(9): 1455–61.
  46. Lilleby K., Garcia P., Gooley T. et al. A prospective, randomized study of cryotherapy during administration of high-dose melphalan to decrease the severity and duration of oral mucositis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 37(11): 1031–5.
  47. Salvador P., Azusano C., Wang L. et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of an oral care intervention to reduce mucositis severity in stem cell transplant patients. J. Pain Sympt. Manage 2012; 44(1): 64–73.
  48. Vokurka S., Bystricka E., Scudlova J. et al. The risk factors for oral mucositis and the effect of cryotherapy in patients after the BEAM and HD-l-PAM 200 mg/m(2) autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2011; 15(5): 508–12.
  49. Antunes H.S., de Azevedo A.M., da Silva Bouzas L.F. et al. Low-power laser in the prevention of induced oral mucositis in bone marrow transplantation patients: a randomized trial. Blood 2007; 109(5): 2250–5.
  50. Silva G.B., Mendonca E.F., Bariani C. et al. The prevention of induced oral mucositis with low-level laser therapy in bone marrow transplantation patients: a randomized clinical trial. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2011; 29(1): 27–31.
  51. Schubert M.M., Eduardo F.P., Guthrie K.A. et al. A phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy of low level laser therapy for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Supp. Care Cancer 2007; 15(10): 1145–54.
  52. Spencer A., Horvath N., Gibson J. et al. Prospective randomised trial of amifostine cytoprotection in myeloma patients undergoing high-dose melphalan conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005; 35(10): 971–7.
  53. Gabriel D.A., Shea T.C., Serody J.S. et al. Cytoprotection by amifostine during autologous stem cell transplantation for advanced refractory hematologic malignancies. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005; 11(12): 1022–30.
  54. Phillips G.L. 2nd, Bernstein S.H., Liesveld J.L. et al. A Phase I trial: dose escalation of melphalan in the ‘BEAM’ regimen using amifostine cytoprotection. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011; 17(7): 1033–42.
  55. Wasko-Grabowska A., Rzepecki P., Oborska S. et al. Efficiency of supersaturated calcium phosphate mouth rinse treatment in patients receiving highdose melphalan or BEAM prior to autologous blood stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience. Transplant. Proc. 2011; 43(8): 3111–3.
  56. Васильева В.А., Кузьмина Л.А., Клясова Г.А. и др. Опыт применения фосфата кальция у больных после высокодозной полихимиотерапии и трансплантации гемопоэтических стволовых клеток. Гематол. и транс- фузиол. 2012; 57(3): 11–3. [Vasil’eva V.A., Kuz’mina L.A., Klyasova G.A. et al. An experience in the use of potassium phosphate in patients after the high-dose polychemotherapy and transplantation of hemopetic stem cells. Gematol. i transfuziol. 2012; 57(3): 11–3. (In Russ.)]
  57. Oblon D.J., Paul S.R., Oblon M.B. et al. Propantheline protects the oral mucosa after high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide and autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997; 20(11): 961–3.
  58. Lockhart P.B., Brennan M.T., Kent M.L. et al. Randomized controlled trial of pilocarpine hydrochloride for the moderation of oral mucositis during autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005; 35(7): 713–20.
  59. Costa L.J., Micallef I.N., Inwards D.J. et al. Effect of the dose per body weight of conditioning chemotherapy on severity of mucositis and risk of relapse after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2008; 143(2): 268–73.
  60. Eisen D., Essell J., Broun E.R. et al. Clinical utility of oral valacyclovir compared with oral acyclovir for the prevention of herpes simplex virus mucositis following autologous bone marrow transplantation or stem cell rescue therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 31(1): 51–5.
  61. Lovenich H., Schutt-Gerowitt H., Keulertz C. et al. Failure of anti-infective mouth rinses and concomitant antibiotic prophylaxis to decrease oral mucosal colonization in autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005; 35(10): 997–1001.
  62. Strupp C., Sudhoff T., Germing U. et al. Transdermal fentanyl during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support. Oncol. Rep. 2000; 7(3): 659–61. 63. Pinana J.L., Montesinos P., Martino R. et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of bacteremia following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 720 adult patients. Ann. Hematol. 2014; 93(2): 299–307