AA Rukavitsyn, SI Kurbanov, OA Rukavitsyn
Academician NN Burdenko Principal Military Clinical Hospital under the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, 3 Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105229
For correspondence: Anatolii Anatol’evich Rukavitsyn, 3 Gospital’naya pl., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105229; Tel: +7(499)263-53-17; e-mail: rukavitsin46@gmail.com
For citation: Rukavitsyn AA, Kurbanov SI, Rukavitsyn OA. Prognostic and Differential Diagnostic Value of Standardized Uptake Volume (SUV) of Fluorodeoxyglucose in Patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Clinical oncohematology. 2017;10(2):182–6 (In Russ).
DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2017-10-2-182-186
ABSTRACT
Background & Aims. Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is still considered one of the most curable oncohematological diseases of lymphoid tissue. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with multispiral computed tomography (CT) is one of precise and easily available methods of imaging of lymphoid neoplasia. The aim is to determine the correlation between the standardized uptake volume (SUV) of 18F-FDG and results of the first-line anti-tumor treatment of HL patients; to evaluate the possibility of differential diagnosis between HL and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) based on SUV.
Materials & Methods. 76 patients (69 men and 7 women) aged from 19 to 75 years (median age 36.7 years) with DLBCL (n = 22) and HL (n = 54) were retrospectively enrolled in the study. The diseases were diagnosed over the period from 2011 until 2015. A combined PET-CT imaging was performed for the disease staging.
Results. The comparison of median SUVs in patients with HL (n = 54) and DLBCL (n = 22) demonstrated that the difference had a very high level of significance (p < 0.001). HL patients demonstrated a significantly lower 18F-FDG SUV than DLBCL patients. The analysis of PET findings demonstrated a correlation between the chosen treatment option for the lymphoma and the SUV level (p < 0.001). HL patients demonstrated an insignificant negative correlation between the SUV level rise and the treatment outcome (p = 0.2).
Conclusion. The SUV level does not affect the treatment outcomes of HL patients according to the ABVD protocol, as well as the metabolic response rate and tumor mass reduction. However, the SUV levels significantly differ in patients with HL and DLBCL. These data may be used as additional criteria for differential diagnosis of HL and DLBCL.
Keywords: SUV, PET-CT, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, DLBCL.
Received: November 21, 2016
Accepted: January 23, 2017
REFERENCES
- Гематология: национальное руководство. Под ред. О.А. Рукавицына. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2015. 776 с.
[Rukavitsyn OA, ed. Gematologiya: natsional’noe rukovodstvo. (Hematology: national guidelines.) Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ.; 2015. 776 p. (In Russ)] - Campo E, Swerdlow SH, Harris NL, et al. The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood. 2011;117(19):5019–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050.
- Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for Initial Evaluation, Staging, and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Lugano Classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(27):3059–67. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.8800.
- Naumann R, Beuthien-Baumann B, Reiss A, et al. Substantial impact of FDG PET imaging on the therapy decision in patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(3):620–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601561.
- D’souza MM, Jaimini A, Bansal A, et al. FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23(4):354–65. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.125626.
- Ngeow JYY, Quek RHH, Ng DCE, et al. High SUV uptake on FDG-PET/CT predicts for an aggressive B-cell lymphoma in a prospective study of primary FDG-PET/CT staging in lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(9):1543–7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp030.
- Schoder H, Noy A, Gonen M, et al. Intensity of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Positron Emission Tomography Distinguishes Between Indolent and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4643–51. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.12.072.