Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerance of Anagrelide, the First Domestic Generic, Compared with Reference Drug

SK Zyryanov1,2, VV Chistyakov1, OI Butranova1, ES Stepanova1, OG Potanina1, RA Abramovich1

1 RUDN University, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198

2 Municipal Clinical Hospital No. 24, 10 Pistsovaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 127015

For correspondence: Olga Igorevna Butranova, MD PhD, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198; Tel.: +7(903)376-71-40; e-mail: butranova-oi@rudn.ru, butranovaolga@mail.ru

For citation: Zyryanov SK, Chistyakov VV, Butranova OI, et al. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerance of Anagrelide, the First Domestic Generic, Compared with Reference Drug. Clinical oncohematology. 2020;13(3):346–53. (In Russ).

DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2020-13-3-346-353


ABSTRACT

Background. Anagrelide is used for the treatment of essential thrombocythemia. This drug selectively affects thrombocytes without inducing pronounced myelosuppression, which provides a satisfactory safety profile.

Aim. To compare pharmacokinetics and to assess bioequivalence of two anagrelide drugs for oral administration in healthy volunteers.

Materials & Methods. Open, randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study comparing pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of anagrelide included 30 volunteers. The participants received a single dose of either test or reference drug, depending on the study period. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected within 12 hours after drug administration. Plasma anagrelide concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by non-compartmental method. ANOVA analysis of variance was used for assessing the difference between the mean values of the AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax pharmacokinetic parameters at 5 % significance level.

Results. The mean values of maximum concentration (Сmax) after a single dose of anagrelide were 12.68 ± 2.99 ng/mL and 12.46 ± 3.15 ng/mL for test and reference drugs, respectively. Relative bioavailability was 1.16 ± 0.18. The AUC0-12 mean values calculated by anagrelide concentrations after a single dose of test and reference drugs were 30.38 ± 7.0 ng • h/mL and 28.78 ± 7.50 ng • h/mL, respectively, and the AUC0-∞ mean values were 31.13 ± 7.15 ng • h/mL and 29.55 ± 7.61 ng • h/mL, respectively. The assessment of main vital functions and laboratory parameters did not reveal any effect of the drugs on the health status of trial participants.

Conclusion. Pharmacokinetic profile of the test drug (generic anagrelide) did not considerably differ from that of reference drug, which indicates in vivo bioequivalence of it. The assessment of drug safety yielded satisfactory tolerance; no serious adverse events have been reported.

Keywords: anagrelide, generic, bioequivalence, essential thrombocythemia, safety, tolerance.

Received: February 19, 2020

Accepted: May 25, 2020

Read in PDF


REFERENCES

  1. Меликян А.Л., Ковригина А.М., Суборцева И.Н. и др. Национальные клинические рекомендации по диагностике и терапии Ph-негативных миелопролиферативных заболеваний (истинная полицитемия, эссенциальная тромбоцитемия, первичный миелофиброз) (редакция 2018 г.). Гематология и трансфузиология. 2018;63(3):275–315. doi: 10.25837/HAT.2019.51.88.001.[Melikyan AL, Kovrigina AM, Subortseva IN, et al. National clinical recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis) (edition 2018). Russian Journal of Hematology and Transfusiology. 2018;63(3):275–315. doi: 25837/HAT.2019.51.88.001. (In Russ)]

  2. Mesa RA, Jamieson C, Bhatia R, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(10):1193–207. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0157.

  3. Rungjirajittranon T, Owattanapanich W, Ungprasert P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thrombosis and bleeding at diagnosis of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5387-9.

  4. Tefferi A, Barbui T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(1):94–108. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24607.

  5. Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, Barbui T. Essential thrombocythemia treatment algorithm 2018. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41408-017-0041-8.

  6. Ianotto JC, Curto-Garcia N, Lauermanova M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera diagnosed before 20 years of age: a systematic review. Haematologica. 2019;104(8):1580–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.200832.

  7. Tefferi A, Barbui T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(1):133–43. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25303.

  8. Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018;32(5):1057–69. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0077-1.

  9. Gisslinger H, Gotic M, Holowiecki J, et al. Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: the ANAHYDRET Study, a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2013;121(10):1720–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-443770.

  10. Samuelson B, Chai-Adisaksopha C, Garcia D. Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in essential thrombocythemia: a meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015;40(4):474–9. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1218-2.

  11. Ito T, Hashimoto Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of anagrelide as a first-line drug in cytoreductive treatment-naive essential thrombocythemia patients in a real-world setting. Eur J Haematol. 2019;103(2):116–23. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13265.

  12. Besses C, Zeller W, Alvarez-Larran A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of anagrelide hydrochloride in young (18–50 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years) patients with essential thrombocythemia. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;50(11):787–96. doi: 10.5414/CP201711.

  13. Petrides PE, Schoergenhofer C, Widmann R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Anagrelide Extended-Release Formulation in Healthy Subjects: Food Intake and Comparison With a Reference Product. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018;7(2):123–31. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.340.

  14. Petrides PE, Gisslinger H, Steurer M, et al. Pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, tolerability, and effects on platelet counts of two formulations of anagrelide in healthy volunteers and patients with thrombocythemia associated with chronic myeloproliferation. Clin Ther. 2009;31(2):386–98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.02.008.

  15. Okamoto S, Miyakawa Y, Smith J, et al. Open-label, dose-titration and continuation study to assess efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of anagrelide in treatment-naive Japanese patients with essential thrombocythemia. Int J Hematol. 2013;97(3):360–8. doi: 10.1007/s12185-013-1265-4.